Common Status Quo
Teams usually choose one of these options before adopting a privacy layer:- Avoid cloud AI for sensitive work
- Redact client or production data manually
- Switch to a local model even when a cloud provider would give better results
- Build one-off masking code inside each app
Who It Fits
PasteGuard is useful when sensitive values appear in normal AI work:- Finance and banking work with customer or transaction context
- Legal and advisory work with privileged or client-confidential material
- Healthcare-adjacent operations with patient or provider details
- Insurance, accounting, consulting, HR, and recruiting work
- Regulated SaaS teams handling logs, support tickets, and production context
Product Paths
Browser Chat
Browser extension beta for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini.
Apps & APIs
Apps, SDKs, internal AI products, and provider-compatible APIs.
Coding Agents
Codex, Claude Code, logs, tickets, codebase context, and secrets.
Deployment Model
PasteGuard can run locally for individual use, or self-hosted for team and infrastructure use. Use local or self-hosted deployment when your team needs tighter control over:- Where private values are processed
- Which provider receives masked requests
- What request metadata is logged
- How sensitive requests are routed to local models
- How masking rules are configured
What To Validate In A Pilot
For a regulated pilot, validate the trust questions before adding more features:- Can users complete real work without manual redaction?
- Do they understand which values stayed local?
- Do they trust the restoration flow?
- Do they need local, self-hosted, or managed deployment?
- Which logs and audit exports are required before production use?